Best Process Automation

Make vs n8n

Make bills each step and runs only in its own cloud. n8n bills each full run and runs on your own servers for free.

Updated By the Best Process Automation deskHow we scoreDisclosure

This guide is free and no vendor pays for a position. Links to vendors can earn the publisher a commission when you sign up. How the site makes money.

Short answer

Make edges n8n overall, 8.3 to 8.0, on ease and app count89. n8n wins for developers who want code steps on every plan, self-hosting and one execution per full run311.

Pick Make if
your builders are not developers and you want a hosted tool from $12 a month billed annually, with unlimited users1.
Pick n8n if
you have developers, run long workflows with many steps, or must keep data on your own servers: the Community edition is free and Cloud starts at €24 a month113.
Make and n8n compared
Maken8n
Our score8.38.0
Free optionFree plan: 1,000 credits a month1Free self-hosted Community edition; Cloud has a free trial2
Paid plans from$12/mo billed annually, 10,000 credits1€24/mo, or €20 billed annually, 2,500 executions3
Billing unitCredits: 1 for each non-AI module action4One execution per full run, any number of steps3
2,000 five-step runs a month (estimate)$12 on Core, billed annually1€20 on Starter, billed annually3
Self-hostingNo; Enterprise adds an on-prem agent for local systems5Yes, free Community edition6
Code stepsJavaScript and Python on paid plans7JavaScript and Python on every Cloud plan3
Integrations3,500+ apps8500+ native, plus any API over HTTP9
Cloud data locationUS and EU data zones10EU, on servers in Frankfurt3

At five steps a run, Make costs less: 2,000 runs use up to 10,000 credits, inside Core at $12, while n8n Starter costs €20 for 2,500 executions, both billed annually13. Longer workflows favor n8n. It still counts one execution per run3, while Make's credits rise with every module4: 2,000 runs of a 20-step workflow need up to 40,000 Make credits, four times Core's entry tier.

Scores by criterion

Make

Score breakdown for Make
Ease of use 20%7.5
Power 25%8.5
Integrations 15%8.5
Price and value 20%8.5
Security and governance 10%8.5
Support and ecosystem 10%8.0

n8n

Score breakdown for n8n
Ease of use 20%6.5
Power 25%9.0
Integrations 15%7.5
Price and value 20%8.5
Security and governance 10%9.0
Support and ecosystem 10%7.5

Visit Make (opens the Make website)Visit n8n (opens the n8n website)

Questions people ask

Is n8n cheaper than Make?

For short workflows, no: 2,000 five-step runs fit Make Core at $12 a month, against €20 for n8n Starter, both billed annually13. For long workflows n8n costs less, because a run counts once however many steps it has3.

Is n8n harder to use than Make?

Yes for most builders. n8n scores 6.5 on ease here against Make's 7.5, and n8n's docs say self-hosting requires technical expertise2.

Can Make be self-hosted like n8n?

No. Every Make plan, Enterprise included, runs on Make's AWS hosting; Enterprise adds an on-prem agent so scenarios reach local systems15.

Sources

  1. Make (Celonis). Pricing & Subscription Packages | Make. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  2. n8n GmbH. Choose how to use n8n | n8n Docs. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  3. n8n GmbH. n8n Plans and Pricing - n8n.io. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  4. Make Help Center. Credits - Help Center. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  5. Make Help Center. On-premise agent - Help Center. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  6. n8n GmbH. Host n8n | Deploy | n8n Docs. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  7. Make Help Center. The Make Code app is available - Help Center. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  8. Make (Celonis). 3,500+ Integration Apps | Connect & Automate Software | Make. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  9. n8n GmbH. AI Workflow Automation Platform - n8n. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  10. Make Help Center. AI providers and data zones in Make - Help Center. Checked 9 Nov 2026.
  11. n8n GmbH. Compare editions | Deploy | n8n Docs. Checked 9 Nov 2026.